Skip to content
purabalela

purabalela

purabalela

  • Home
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Law
  • Music
  • Toggle search form

Renewal Of DIAC Rules Include Updates On Third Party Funding And Costs Recovery – Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Posted on June 20, 2022 By admin No Comments on Renewal Of DIAC Rules Include Updates On Third Party Funding And Costs Recovery – Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

20 June 2022

Erso Capital Advisors LLC

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On the 2nd of March 2022, the Dubai International Arbitration Center (“DIAC”) published the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022 (“the 2022 Rules”). The Rules follow the re-launch of DIAC by Decree No. 34 of Year 2021, which abolished existing arbitration centers – including the DIFC-LCIA and EMAC – and created a single consolidated arbitration center in the DIAC.

The 2022 Rules position serves the aim of positioning Dubai as a leading arbitration hub, by establishing a framework of modern arbitration procedures that introduce efficiency and flexibility to DIAC Arbitration proceedings and strengthen DIAC’s position as one of the leading global arbitration centers.

Third-party funding

The previous rules published fifteen years ago, did not address the issue of third-party arbitration funding. Though Funding is not as widely used in the UAE, as it is in other jurisdictions, its use is on the rise in UAE. The new rules expressly allow third-party funding, provided that the funding arrangement is concluded before the tribunal is constituted. A party using third-party funding must also disclose the identity of the funder, as well as whether the funder has committed to any adverse cost liability.

Article 22 of the 2022 Rules provides that parties who enter third-party funding arrangements must promptly disclose this fact to all other parties and the center and must disclose whether the funder has committed to an adverse cost liability.

Recovery of legal fees

DIAC tribunals can now award legal fees and expenses as part of the costs of the arbitration. Under the 2007 rules and costs appendix, only DIAC’s administrative fees and fees and expenses of the tribunal and experts could be awarded. This position was previously upheld by the onshore courts, even for instance where arbitration agreements had expressly permitted “legal costs” to be recovered.

The prior costs rules meant that successful parties had to stomach their own legal costs. This impacted many claimants seeking to recover relatively low damages sums in the UAE. As there would be little point in incurring the significant legal costs associated with arbitration to recover relatively modest sums. The 2022 rules update is therefore a hugely positive development, one that is likely to allow more worthy parties to bring their claims before a tribunal and increase access to justice in the UAE.

Other changes

  • DIFC Default Seat -The 2007 Rules provided for onshore Dubai as the default seat of arbitration where the parties had not specified a seat. In line with this, the 2022 Rules enshrine the principle that the DIFC shall be the default seat of arbitration in the absence of an agreement on the seat and location / venue. This is an important shift for international parties. It means that the DIFC Arbitration Law (which is based on the UNCITRAL model arbitration law) will apply to the arbitration and the courts with supervisory powers over the arbitration will apply common law principles and function in the English language..

  • New Arbitration Court Powers -The Arbitration Court is empowered to perform several functions under the 2022 Rules. In addition to appointing arbitrators, the Arbitration Court’s powers also include determining certain applications made before the formation of an arbitral tribunal such as preliminary objections concerning the existence validity, scope or applicability of the agreement to arbitrate; applications for consolidation; and applications for joinder.

  • Consolidation – Article 8 of the 2022 Rules sets out a framework dealing with issues of multiple contracts and the consolidation of claims. Article 8.1 of the 2022 Rules provides that a party may submit a “single Request in respect of multiple claims arising out of or in connection with more than one agreement to arbitrate”. Either the parties must agree to consolidate, or it must be demonstrated, that all claims in the arbitrations are made under the same agreement to arbitrate; or the arbitrations involving the same parties, the agreements to arbitrate are compatible, and:

    • The disputes arise out of the same legal relationship (s), or

    • The underlying contracts consist of a principal contract and its ancillary contract (s), or

    • The claims arise out of the same transaction or series of related transactions.


  • Expedited proceedings – The new rules also provide for expedited proceedings in matters where the claim value is AED 1 million or less, the parties agree or in cases of exceptional urgency.

  • Exceptional procedures – the ability to appoint an emergency arbitrator, where urgent interim relief is needed before a tribunal has been formally constituted.

  • Videoconferencing – The 2022 Rules allow hearings to take place virtually by videoconference.

TheJudge affiliate and funder, Erso Capital serves a global client base of businesses and law firms with discretionary funds, single managed accounts, and co-investment funds. They are active in the UAE and
finance DIAC Arbitrations. If you have an arbitration matter you’d like to discuss funding for contact the team at Erso at info@ersocap.com

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from United States

Arbitration Versus Litigation

IR Global

In my practice I have tried cases in court as well as in arbitration. I am also an arbitrator and have held numerous hearings as both an individual neutral and as a member of a panel.

This Week At The Ninth: PJ

Morrison & Foerster LLP

This week, the Ninth Circuit clarifies personal jurisdiction doctrine in the context of a defamation suit between a nonresident plaintiff and out-of-state defendants.

.

Law Tags:Arbitration & Dispute Resolution, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, mondaq, Renewal Of DIAC Rules Include Updates On Third Party Funding And Costs Recovery

Post navigation

Previous Post: High Court Upholds Award Of Costs For Third Party Funding – Arbitration & Dispute Resolution
Next Post: Ankura CTIX FLASH Update – May 17, 2022 – Security

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022

Categories

  • Finance
  • Law
  • Music
  • Sports

Recent Posts

  • What causes golf clubs to break? We have the answers.
  • Creating Inclusive Workplaces for Neurodivergent and Differently Abled Employees
  • CFPB Seeks Comments On Credit Card Company Penalty Policies – Consumer Credit
  • New Allen Toussaint Legacy Act Creates a Right of Publicity in Louisiana
  • Supreme Court Overturning Constitutional Right To Abortion Will Impact Employee Benefit Plans – Employee Benefits & Compensation

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

Copyright © 2022 purabalela.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme