By December 2021, the National Commission for Informatics and Liberation (CNIL) has met with a commuter in conformity with the agreement of its videoprotection and camera-camera utilization by the municipal police.
Elle lance dans la continuité de cette mise en demeure une consultation public aux conditions de deploiement des caméras dites «intelligentes» ou «augmentées» dans les espaces publics.
This consultation, over at the public jusqu’a 11 mar 2022, visits à to accompany the deployment of these dispositions in the public space in respect of the droits of persons, noting and acknowledging the citoennes associations, for finalizing the CNIL à prendre position on This sujet de plus en plus actuel.
The camera dits ug augmentées »: the new priority of CNIL
On the other hand, the regulation of cameras «intelligents» in the public domain is due to one of the priorities of the French guardians, given the fact that it is aware of the type of dispositives that can be found on the screen.
It is clear that the primaries of the project are not subject to consultation for the part that fixes or deploys mobiles in lieutenants over and over to the public, excluding privacy or other biological reconciliation issues.
These cameras give ug augmentations u or encore «intelligents» on the extraction of particulate matter from information on the basis of an automated treatment of many values and algorithms. Elsewhere, we’ve got the artistic intelligence on the technology that analyzes the images that keep the manipulator going for the sake of conclusions.
This apparatus serves as a great utility for the public sector, in which they allow the perpetrator to place orders on suspicious events. The first notation that utilizes to quickly replenish the baggage abandonment or the presence of incumbents on the public view, analyzes the frequency of a lie to regulate flux or encore detectable non-respectable values été Experimenté lors de la crise sanitaire.
This displays the potential of utility utilization in privacy in the domain of security or for the management of flux (heat map).
The risks liilis utilisation des caméras “augmentées” identifiés par la CNIL
Due to its nature and its ability to analyze, it can be said that new dispositions have been found at the point of view in which some of the questions are new, not always a point of view of the same jurisprudence, yet more technique.
A massive treatment of donations personnel
In fact, on the other hand, it is not possible to recognize these new cameras as the “simple prologue” of the existing cameras, in which the current capacity of the analysis has greatly diminished. If the images from the video surveillance cameras «classics» do not have visions that are from the individual and there is a sensitive particle (search for a person), the images are captured by the cameras «augmentation» before the object falls. Analyze questions on the employment systems of the coordinator.
Cela aboutirait selon la CNIL a massive treatment of donations personnelwhich poses a problem with lui-même regardless of the droits and libertarian foundations of individuals who donn lest ont été collectés.
In order to collect massive donations of sensitive data and in addition to automated manipulation, not only conformities but also information and liberties from January 6, 1978, there is no regulation on the protection of donors (RGPD) which is not allowed. Europe does not have the consent consent to collect donations.
A general surveillance
The existence of these new dispositions, which are intuitively articulated and automated treatments, will make you happy. la mise en place d’une surveillance «généralisée» des personnes And this is more than just a situation in the public domain.
The other droits pour into this sensation from retrieving manners such as the freedom of speech and venereal, the freedom of expression and reunion, the love of manifold or encore the freedom of conscience and the practice of culture.
It is also important to evaluate the risks involved in droits and liberties of individuals within the trajectory of justifiable access to the utilization of these devices and the juices of individuals at the expense of their droits. The risks to the liaisons are not dependent on the finality of the treaty (donnés collectés à des f statns statisti )s) but the maniètre do not have the camouflage «augmentation» so much respect. -immédiate des images.
In this sense, the CNIL has made it necessary to conduct an analysis at the cascade of the camera «augmentation», some of which are not treated by the two personnel personnel.
The disposable invisibles
A different constructor of the authoritarian side in the fait que The person is not so, the plupart of time, but the conscience of those dispositions or all of the moons of the late ces derniers à analuser leur comportement. This resulted in a direct inclination towards its position, which is clear in the title of Article 21 RGPD, which is difficult to measure in the practice of this type of disposition. This is because CNIL hopes that the disposable perceptions of its users will be satisfied – not for the sake of signifier but refusal – is insufficient for considering it as a variable modality of the position.
The disposable soupis is an encoder of particles
The CNIL rappelling that displays that the cameras give «augmentations» does not have the exception or respect of the principals of the RGPD. At the end of the day, the treatment of donors in front of the d ,trs, this d devnier dratra with its essentials, proportionality and respect for the interests of the people on the collection. A basic leggings on the other side have no retention.
The manners are more important than evidence that disposits, the CNIL council has more to support its adaptations, since it provides the person with the presence of dispositives, and the realization of an implicit analysis, from the observer’s point of view. Take a look at the surveillance equipment in place.
The CNIL will be dependent on the position of the project which is the legality of recursions à the analysis of algorithmic images of cameras, realizations in real time and in the presence of an intervention immortality or the practice of administration. On the services of the police, this subordination is due to the specificity of an authorization and specific specificity. A
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.