In order to get the printer to communicate through the electronic platform via the platform e-barreau For the sake of the apple, the sans rendered in complying the obstacles practices auxiliary to make the request for respect, the course of cassation a fait preuve d’un formalism excess.
The faits are the origin of the decision made by its members: the associations of a society, confronted à a different financier, a declaration of arbitrariness and the right of the arbitrariness of the condominium solids. A recursion in the annals est alors introduces the association given by the apple of Douai and address by leu avocat au greffe par voie papier. Controversially contested alors of the Activities, arguing that the aurat of the last remnants was dematerialized, in the application of articles 1495 and 930-1 alina 1e du Code de procédure civile.
On January 29, 2015, the Consul of the Mise in Etat (CME) construct the information formula on the platform e-barreau ne permattait pass de saisir un «recours en annulation d’une sentence arbitrale ous sous cet intitulé. On the other hand, the platform does not allow the parties to qualify in a way that «demand u or« defender »or the status of their identification but uniquely int the end» or appe the appearance », notices prop é the procurement of the apple. At the very least, the CME concludes that the demander’s justification is due to a è cause u to the sensation of Article 930-1 align 2e The Code of Civil Procedure, which allows transmission through electronic and decryptable receivables.
The ordinance makes it clear that there is a difference of opinion between the app and the court of Douai which was released on March 30, 2011, due to the application of Article 930-1, or the convention concludes. The cour d’appel of Douai and the dix barreaux of his reserve n’avient prévu d’inclure le recurses en annulation d’une sentence arbitrale dans le champ de la electronic ektronique obligatoire. They rely on the fact that the information formula does not allow them to pass the quality of the parties to their exact denominations. Elle en déduit qu’il n’y a paas lieu de reprocher au demandeur de n’avoir pas remis son recours par voie electronic et declare son recours recevable.
The decision was not made, since the cassation decides that the receivability of recursions in the annulation of the sentence arbitrale is strictly conditioned by the remix à the jurisprudence by the electronic voice and pronouncing the cassation sans renvoi, privat ainsi le demand Exercise a recursion in annulus against the arbitrary sentence.
The job is not to start all over again. Demandeur saisit la Cour europeéne des droits de l’Homme (CEDH), southeast que la de cassation a porté une attendire disproportionéée à son droit d’accès à un tribunal.
On July 9, 2022, the CEDH, after receiving a copy of the Proportionality Act, retains its uniqueness in violation of Article 6§1 of the European Convention on the Rights of the Child. Elle considered that the cassation of the court should facilitate a formality that guarantees the security of jurisdiction and the administration of justice should not impose it and that doit, dès lors, should be regarded as excessive. Elle retrieved in that the requisite is to impose a charge disproportionately which romps the equivalent equivalent entries, the one part, the right legislation assures the respect of formal conditions for the right jurisprudence and the other part of the droit d. ‘accès au juge.
The conveyance of noting that a cant arrênt pount encore f lr obobjet d’un renovoi devant la Grande Chambre, is not definite. Toutefois, son aport pratique demeure considerable. If the CEDH affirms that it is not an irrelevant, not desirable, not accessible to the electronic communication of a proclamation with a proclamation with obligation obligation, it invites all to pay tribute to the applicant, in addition to the application , an excuse of formalism which portrays the presence of the proclamation.
Merci Elena Andary for your participation in this article.
 Person Toute personne a droit à ce que cause soit entendue équitablement, publiquement et dans un delai raisnable, par un tribunal independent and impartial This is the first time that all accusations have been made in this regard. The juggernaut of our public response, however, counts the audience’s attention to the press and the public as a whole or a part of the proclamation in the pursuit of morality, of the public order or of National security in a democratic society, since the interests of the miners or the protection of the privacy of the parties at the time of its arrival, or in the absence of a negotiation process at the tribunal attending to the interests of justice. A